The District Court rendered summary judgment for the Government. history makes clear that this Act (30 U.S.C. § 611) was intended to remove common types of sand, gravel, and stone from the coverage of the mining laws, under which they served as a basis for claims to land patents, and to place the disposition of such materials under the
The employer, Jewell Ridge, sought declaratory judgment against its employee's union to determine whether the time spent traveling underground by the coal miners between the portals of the employer's two bituminous coal mines and the working faces was included in the compensable workweek under § 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a).
A mining or mill site claim is “property in the fullest sense of the word.” 66 Despite the absence of a patent, the government cannot take the a valid mining claim for public use without paying compensation. 67 The owner of a perfected mining or mill site claim “is not required ․ to secure patent from the United States; but so long as he complies with all provisions of the mining laws, his
The Supreme Court, in a judgement on February 27, said all such mining leases by the state governments and Union territories will need environment clearance from the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF).
Harlan Fiske Stone Stone. Owen J. Roberts Roberts. Hugo L. Black Black. Stanley Reed Reed. Felix Frankfurter Frankfurter. William O. Douglas Douglas. The Supreme Court reversed the district court, holding that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual the right to keep and bear a sawed-off double-barrel shotgun. Writing for the
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2019 MT276 MINES MANAGEMENT, INC., NEWHI, INC., and such mining claims, mill sites or other real property interests shall not 2013, the District Court granted summary judgment to Bakie and denied MMI’s motion.
The quarry owners had moved the Supreme Court after a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in December 2015 set aside an amendment brought in to the provisions of the Kerala Minor Mineral
This aspect has been made abundantly clear in the decisions of this Court in Ambica Quarry Works v. State of Gujarat 1987 1 SCC 213, Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P 1989 Supp 1 SCC 504 and recently in the order dated 29-11-1996 (Supreme Court Monitoring Committee v.
The apex court then directed the state government to stop issuing mining licences. However, when stone quarry owners approached the Supreme Court again, the court ruled that mining can take place one kilometre from the park. Despite court’s orders, the mine owners did not bother to take permission and consent from the state government.
213), Rura' Litigation and Entitlement Kendra versus State of U.P. (1989 Suppl. (1) SCC 504), and recently in the order dated 29th November, 1996 in W.P.(C) No.749/95 (Supreme Court Monitoring Committee vs. Mussorie Dehradun Development Authority and ors.). The earlier decision of this Court in State of Bihar Vs. BanshiRam Modi and ors.
Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America, 325 U.S. 161 (1945), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with the compensation of mine workers for time spent traveling to work sites while underground.
The supreme court of the territory, however, rested its judgment of affirmance, not only upon the bar of the statute, but upon the further fact found by it that Ortiz and his wife had executed a valid mutual will, by which, upon the death of Ortiz, title to the mine in question vested in his widow, through whom the mining company claimed.
Harlan Fiske Stone Stone. Owen J. Roberts Roberts. Hugo L. Black Black. Stanley Reed Reed. Felix Frankfurter Frankfurter. William O. Douglas Douglas. The Supreme Court reversed the district court, holding that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual the right to keep and bear a sawed-off double-barrel shotgun. Writing for the
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2019 MT276 MINES MANAGEMENT, INC., NEWHI, INC., and such mining claims, mill sites or other real property interests shall not 2013, the District Court granted summary judgment to Bakie and denied MMI’s motion.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed all 88 mining leases renewed by the BJP government in Goa in 2015 to “benefit private mining leaseholders.” The 102-page judgment of the apex court noted
Aug 03, 2000· The High Court distinguished its earlier judgment in the case of M/s Best Chemical & Lime Stone Industries Pvt. Ltd. because there the assessee was engaged in the business of extracting limestone and its sale either as such or after converting it into lime and lime dust or concrete by stone
Dec 05, 2014· The Supreme Court has held that the government is not entitled to any mining royalty if a developer excavates land for laying foundation of a building, thus rejecting the Maharashtra government
213), Rura' Litigation and Entitlement Kendra versus State of U.P. (1989 Suppl. (1) SCC 504), and recently in the order dated 29th November, 1996 in W.P.(C) No.749/95 (Supreme Court Monitoring Committee vs. Mussorie Dehradun Development Authority and ors.). The earlier decision of this Court in State of Bihar Vs. BanshiRam Modi and ors.
The Supreme Court Digest of Recent Cases is a compilation of digest notes of the recent Supreme Court case-law.This compilation is fully searchable, and looks up word(s) or phrase(s) in the Supreme Court Digest of Recent cases and displays the case-note where your search term occurs.
The apex court then directed the state government to stop issuing mining licences. However, when stone quarry owners approached the Supreme Court again, the court ruled that mining can take place one kilometre from the park. Despite court’s orders, the mine owners did not bother to take permission and consent from the state government.
lower-court judgment in stone. Miller v. Benson, 68 F.3d 163, 164 (7th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (vacating summary judgment for the government even though amendment to the challenged statute “g[a]ve plain-tiffs exactly what they sought in th[e] litigation”). Public Knowledge nevertheless argues (at 14–15)
Supreme Court Orders Bombay High Court Orders National Green Tribunal Orders Sand Mining Sawantwadi-Dodamarg PROJECTS Noise Pollution Sand Mining Air Pollution Stone Quarrying Firecrackers Light Pollution. Awareness Campaigns SAND MINING FEATURES. News.
Jan 16, 2017· "The 2014 Supreme Court judgement found mining after 2007 to be illegal. The amount of what was illegally mined was estimated at Rs 65,000 crore, which is Rs 4.5 lakh per person in Goa. The Goa budget is about Rs 10,000 crore, this is 6.5 times the annual budget. The illegal mining was done under the Congress rule.
Missouri State Archives Supreme Court of Missouri Historical Records. The Supreme Court of Missouri Historical Database provides an index and abstract of the criminal and civil court cases that were appealed to the territorial Superior Court and state Supreme Court of Missouri up to 1868, and a partial listing of cases to 1889.